![]() ![]() It is also disproportionately spread over 'low volume' inventory. There is a 'yuuuuuge' click fraud problem on the Internet where a shady advertising reseller and a botnet collude to put ads on things and do what ever action is needed to get them to pay out (click (CPC) or view (CPI), never execute a transaction (CPA)). However, when running a search engine we discovered there is a second order relationship between page traffic and advertising, that is click fraud. It's interesting to consider though.Īn interesting read. Is this what you have in mind? Other than this, I'm having trouble thinking of possibilities that exist between content-targeted and user-targeted via tracking. The only possibility I can think of that's somewhat in-between, is a site tracking a user across their own site (first-party only), and targeting ads based on that collected data, rather than contracting that out to Google who can follow you across many sites. some data is known about them, and an ad is being shown to them based on whatever that known data is)? Conversely, if nothing is known about the user (they haven't been tracked at all), how can an ad be targeted at them (besides knowing they are viewing a webpage on a certain topic, but then we're back at being content-targeted)? If an ad is targeted at a user, doesn't that necessarily mean they were tracked to some degree (i.e. I suppose because I'm having trouble imagining what that in-between space looks like. Hmmm, that's a possibility I haven't considered. I'm also interested in hearing from others with demonetized videos, that may be suffering from the same auto captioning and blacklisted words issue. The only real suggestion to test out is to not say explicit in your next video. For most small channels wrongly flagged, there's no real fix (for the old video). You can request a manual review of the affected videos, but only if your video has 1000 views in the past 7 days. ![]() But there's also a very unsafe context that I doubt google is willing to automatically monetize without some sort of manual review. ![]() Once again given the context, it's totally safe. In your case, after watching your video with closed captioning I notice you use the word "explicit" a lot in your video. So I think there's some sort of blacklist of words said in videos that will auto demonetize videos. I've manually fixed the closed captioning with the correct words, but as of now the video is still demonetized. I said "Prosper202" but Google heard "pr0st!tut3" (I edited the actual word just in case HN also has auto block filters) But as you can see, it's obviously a not safe for brands keyword. Nothing controversial either, until I looked at the auto generated close captioning. I was a bit surprised since it was a basic boring screen share video. In my case, I have a demonitized tutorial video on how to download and upgrade my software. I'm 99.9% sure it's nothing to do with your tags and everything to do with some sort of speech to text analysis google is doing on your video. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |